List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Verify accuracy of data and technical records | 1.1 | Retrieve and collate all relevant data files and technical records for the specified time interval, tests or product range or project |
| 1.2 | Inspect data records to check the integrity of data entry, alterations, transfers and calculations |
| 1.3 | Confirm that technical records contain sufficient information to provide an audit trail for the tests involved |
|
2 | Assess the quality of data/results | 2.1 | Use charts and tables to determine whether data/results are within specified limits |
| 2.2 | Analyse data trends and results for blanks, duplicates and/or check samples to detect systematic uncertainties |
| 2.3 | Use statistical tests and workplace procedures to check data acceptability |
| 2.4 | Check that estimations of uncertainties are reasonable and consistent with test method, client or product specification requirements |
| 2.5 | Identify results that cannot be reconciled with technical records and/or expected outcomes |
|
3 | Identify potential causes for unacceptable results | 3.1 | Review user checks and calibration performance records to confirm that equipment or instrument meets test specifications |
| 3.2 | Check for obvious sources of interferences that may have occurred during measurements |
| 3.3 | Review technical records to identify human or environmental factors that could affect reliability of results |
| 3.4 | Review records of sample collection and preparation to confirm chain of custody requirements and adherence to sampling procedures |
| 3.5 | Check that any documented deviations from sampling procedures and/or test methods were technically justified and authorised |
| 3.6 | Check the condition of sampling equipment and/or stored samples if available/appropriate |
|
4 | Report findings to relevant personnel | 4.1 | Summarise the quality of test results and data |
| 4.2 | Document potential sources or instances of non-conforming work and assess their significance |
| 4.3 | Recommend appropriate preventative/corrective actions to improve sampling, testing and/or calibration activities |
| 4.4 | Prepare reports in a format and style consistent with their intended use and workplace guidelines |
Evidence of competence in this unit must satisfy all of the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include demonstration of:
analysing at least one (1) series of test results and data to detect potential or actual non-conformances, assessing their significance, identifying potential causes and recommending preventative or corrective actions
reviewing the accuracy and completeness of at least one (1) set of technical records for sampling or testing activities
reviewing the accuracy and completeness of at least one (1) set of instrument calibration/performance records
recognising significant trends in data and/or aberrant results
using statistical tests to estimate uncertainties and determine data acceptability
applying effective problem-solving strategies, such as root cause analysis
following workplace procedures for documenting and reporting information about quality.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge of:
characteristic properties of the materials under investigation
specifications for samples, tests and/or calibration activities under investigation
scientific and technical knowledge of the procedures, equipment, materials and instrumentation used to generate the test results and data
at least three (3) statistical tests used to estimate uncertainties and determine data acceptability
workplace data quality procedures and/or legal traceability requirements
relevant hazards, work health and safety (WHS) and environment requirements
Judgement of competence must be based on holistic assessment of the evidence. Assessment methods must confirm consistency of performance over time, rather than a single assessment event.
This unit of competency is to be assessed in the workplace or a simulated workplace environment. A simulated workplace environment must reflect realistic operational workplace conditions that cover all aspects of workplace performance, including the environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately. Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept in each case).
This unit of competency may be assessed with:
MSL925001 Analyse data and report results
relevant MSL974000 series units of competency
relevant MSL975000 series units of competency
Holistic assessment methods include:
review of verified records and reports generated by the candidate
feedback from supervisors and peers about the candidate's ability to monitor the quality of test results and data
questioning to assess understanding of trends in data, sources of uncertainty and preventative/corrective actions.
Access is required to instruments, equipment, materials, workplace documentation, procedures and specifications associated with this unit, including, but not limited to:
workplace quality assurance procedures based on Australian and/or international standards, and workplace quality manuals and procedures
technical records of sampling and testing activities, and instrument calibration/performance records:
appropriate software
samples, sampling equipment and test equipment, instruments and materials.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
The assessor must demonstrate both technical competence and currency.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR
relevant workplace experience.
Currency can be demonstrated through:
performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR
having consulted with a laboratory about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.